Rasheeda Mcadoo vs Nikol Mircheva Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 28 Jul at 04:25 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
R. Mcadoo vs N. Mircheva

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Mcadoo 1 - 0 Mircheva
They have played 2 sets in total, with Rasheeda Mcadoo winning 2 and Nikol Mircheva winning 0. The last match between Rasheeda Mcadoo and Nikol Mircheva was at the W75 Hechingen, 28-07-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Clay, with Rasheeda Mcadoo getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mcadoo | 1 |
| Mircheva | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) W75 Hechingen(07-28-25)
R. Mcadoo vs N. Mircheva H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 52.28% (195-178) | Career Total W/L | 45.83% (11-13) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
R. Mcadoo vs N. Mircheva Match Preview:
- Which player demonstrates stronger recent second serve performance? Mcadoo, winning 43.22% of points versus Mircheva's 40.69%.
- Mircheva excels in return game stats, winning 54.74% of opponents' second serve points, compared to Mcadoo's 47.9%.
- On first serve returns, Mircheva leads with 33.15% while Mcadoo is at 29.78%.
- Under pressure, Mcadoo saves 56.54% of breakpoints, surpassing Mircheva's 42.22%.
- In recent matches, Mcadoo's win rate stands at 56%, slightly better than Mircheva's 54.55%.
- The preferred surface for both is Clay, with Mcadoo achieving a higher win percentage of 54% versus Mircheva's 50%.
- At the Challenger/ITF level, Mcadoo wins 56% of matches, whereas Mircheva wins 42.86%.
- Mircheva typically faces tougher opponents, with an average opponent rank of 276.55, compared to Mcadoo's 455.18.
- In deciding sets, Mcadoo excels with a 62% win rate, outperforming Mircheva's 50%.
- Break point conversion favors Mcadoo with 37.93% success, over Mircheva's 30.95%.
Editorial Prediction (July 28, 2025, UTC):
While Mircheva shows advantage in return game statistics and tends to play against higher-ranked opponents, she underperforms in critical areas such as break point conversion and under pressure situations where Mcadoo prevails. This gives Mcadoo an edge in more decisive moments during matches.
Mcadoo's consistent performance on Clay, better saving of break points, and higher win rates in both recent matches and deciding sets indicate a slight advantage. Furthermore, her superior second serve success further tilts the balance in her favor.
Considering these factors, Mcadoo appears to have the upper hand and is likely to win the upcoming tennis match.
Rasheeda Mcadoo vs Nikol Mircheva Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
R. Mcadoo vs N. Mircheva H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:5:16 | Average Match Time | 1:5:16 |
| 63% (20/32) | 1st Serve % | 60% (31/52) |
| 85% (17/20) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (17/31) |
| 92% (11/12) | 2nd Serve Win % | 24% (5/21) |
| 71% (5/7) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) |
| 58% (30/52) | Return Points Win % | 13% (4/32) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
R. Mcadoo Recent Matches Played
N. Mircheva Recent Matches Played

R. Mcadoo vs N. Mircheva Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52.28% (195/178) | YTD Win/Loss | 45.83% (11/13) |
| 52.41% (446/405) | Sets Win/Loss | 47.17% (25/28) |
| 52.09% (4099/3770) | Games Win/Loss | 47.80% (239/261) |
| 50.64% (79/77) | Hard Win/Loss | 42.86% (3/4) |
| 54.44% (98/82) | Clay Win/Loss | 47.06% (8/9) |
| 48.65% (18/19) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 993 | Aces Total | 15 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 950 | Total Double Faults | 32 |
| 1:24:9 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 467.79 | Average Opponent Rank | 161.67 |
| 55% (10599/19227) | 1st Serve % | 57% (283/495) |
| 65% (6891/10599) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (179/283) |
| 47% (4037/8627) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (82/212) |
| 47% (983/2079) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 37% (23/62) |
| 44% (8104/18537) | Return Points Win % | 42% (204/486) |
| 52.12% (172/158) | Challenger W/L | 40.00% (4/6) |
| 53.49% (23/20) | Futures W/L | 50.00% (7/7) |
| 52% (190/366) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 46% (11/24) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 43% (32/75) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (2/2) |
| 45% (50/110) | Deciding Set Win % | 40% (2/5) |
| 82% (206/169) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (12/11) |
| 17% (206/36) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (12/1) |
| 16% (167/26) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (12/0) |